Thursday, March 24, 2011

Captive Breeding Program for Eastern Loggerhead Shrikes


Imlay, T.I., Crowley, J.F., Argue A.M., Steiner J.C., Norris D.R., Stutchbury, B.J.M. 2010. Survival, dispersal and early migration movements of captive-bred juvenile eastern loggerhead shrikes (Lanius ludovicianus migrans). Biological Conservation 143: 2578–2582.

Link to article:

Captive breeding programs are established for species that are threatened or endangered to maintain, increase or restore populations in areas where they exist or had existed in the past. Shrikes, a group of migratory passerine birds, are declining around the world. In Canada, there are less than 35 known breeding pairs, which are listed as Endangered by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC, 2010). A study carried out by Imlay et al. (2010) looked at captive-bred eastern loggerhead shrikes (Lanius ludovicianus migrans) in Carden Plain, a Nationally Significant Important Bird Area in the township of Kirkfield, Ontario. These birds were a part of a captive breeding and release program established in 1997 by Environment Canada as a National Recovery Strategy for the species.
Imlay et al. examined post-release survival both before and right after migration had begun, and the natural and human causes of mortality using ground and aerial telemetry. The study was carried out in 2007 and 2008. Captive shrikes with radio transmitters attached were released 5-9 weeks after fledgling (beyond the normal age of independence in the wild, which occurs at about 4 weeks). Eighteen were released in 2007 and 20 were released in 2008, usually in batches in order of when they hatched.
On the ground, birds were tracked every 1-2 days. When encountered, carcasses were retrieved to assess causes of mortality: cleanly plucked feathers was assumed to be a result of raptor predation, chewed body and missing feathers from mammalian predation, and relatively intact bodies from starvation. Shrikes were also tracked through aerial searches four times in 2007 and ten times in 2008. Aerial monitoring was done to determine if they had dispersed from the release site, and then migrated; if the birds could not be found in the study area for several days and couldn’t be re-located by ground, they were assumed to have migrated.
The average annual return rate of juvenile shrikes was about 4.6%, which is about four times higher than the average return rate seen in wild shrikes. Overall survival rate of juvenile shrikes was about 75%. Nine juveniles were found dead, and predation was the cause of mortality in five birds, and unknown for the other four birds. Mortality was not significantly correlated to release date. Migration occurred in August and September, with age at migration negatively correlated to hatch date (i.e. those that hatched earlier, tended to migrate later). During the first stages of migration, no cases of mortality were found.
Providing captive breeding programs for migratory passerines can be difficult. Passerines are known to have high natal dispersal (dispersal from the birth site to a new site where the bird will reproduce), making them hard to track, as it is possible they may recruit in distant populations or die en route to the dispersal site. These types of birds also tend to show high mortality during migration. Although positive results have been revealed for the captive breeding program examined by Imlay et al., it is still very important to understand the reason for the decline of the eastern loggerhead shrike population in order to continue successful efforts in reviving the shrike populations.
Words: 528
 

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Wells Gray Park Seeks UNESCO World Heritage Status


Link to main article:


Clearwater Times 2011. Wells Gray Park seeks UNESCO World Heritage status. Black Press Group, Victoria, BC. Available from http://www.bclocalnews.com/bc_thompson_nicola/ clearwatertimes/news/117440093.html (accessed March 9, 2011).

Tourism Wells Gray 2010. Wells Gray Country British Columbia – Volcanoes – Waterfalls Wilderness and Wildlife. Tourism Wells Gray, Clearwater, BC. Available from http://www. wellsgray.ca/site/discovering-wells-gray/volcanos.html (accessed March 9, 2011).

UNESCO World Heritage Centre 2011. UNESCO World Heritage Centre – Official Site. UNESCO, Paris, France. Available from http://whc.unesco.org/ (accessed March 9, 2011).


          Wells Gray Provincial Park, one of the four largest parks in British Columbia covering 5400 km2 in area, is known for its preservation of a pristine environment, which includes: forests, majestic mountains, rivers, lakes and breath-taking waterfalls, as well as various plant and animal species representative of B.C. The landscape of Wells Gray Park, formed by glaciers from the last ice age, includes the internationally significant volcanic features of the Wells Gray-Clearwater Volcanic Field that began forming about 3,500,000 years ago. It is because of this stunning volcanic landscape that the park was established in 1939. 

                                                                                 Tourism Wells Gray, 2010

            So amazing is the landscape of Wells Gray Park, that there are currently developments in establishing it as a UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) World Heritage Site. At the moment, a consultant is being hired to produce a development plan through the District of Clearwater and the provincial Community Tourism Opportunity program of Thompson Okanagan Tourism. Acquiring World Heritage Status from UNESCO would give the park international recognition, however it is a lengthy process because the World Heritage Committee only meets once a year to review nominations. In the meantime, the development plan will also seek UNESCO GeoPark status, which recognizes sites that are of important to earth sciences.
            An international treaty established in 1972 allowed UNESCO to drive developments to  “identify, protect and preserve cultural and natural heritage” globally that had outstanding value to humanity, and include involvement from communities around the world. In preserving these sites, many of which are of cultural importance, we are protecting irreplaceable sources of inspiration and education about the world’s past, as well as maintaining important ecosystem functions and services for future generations (i.e. these sites have ‘existence values’). The World Heritage List of sites includes 911 properties, some of which include: East Africa’s Serengeti, the Pyramids of Egypt, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef and, hitting close to home, the Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks.
            First, nomination to become a World Heritage Site requires that a Tentative List be made of significant cultural and/or natural features of the landscape and after that, a Nomination file must be produced including one of those features. Next, the file is handed over the International Council on Monuments and Sites and the World Conservation Union for evaluation in order to provide recommendations to the World Heritage Committee. Finally, to be selected for the World Heritage List, the area in question must be of “outstanding universal value” and meet one or more of ten selection criteria (for more info, visit: http://whc.unesco.org/en/criteria). A few of the criteria that stood out to me as applying to Wells Gray Park were:

              vii.    “To contain superlative natural phenomena or areas of exceptional natural beauty and aesthetic importance,”
            viii.     “To be outstanding examples representing major stages of earth's history, including the record of life, significant on-going geological processes in the development of landforms, or significant geomorphic or physiographic features,” and
                ix.    “To be outstanding examples representing significant on-going ecological and biological processes in the evolution and development of terrestrial, fresh water, coastal and marine ecosystems and communities of plants and animals.”

            According to this criteria, it seems there should almost be no problem in establishing Wells Gray Park as a World Heritage Site considering its outstanding pristine environment, in which humans can is still set foot while at the same time preserving these amazing and important geological processes (ex. erosion by waterfalls) and ecological and biological processes that still take place naturally. Coining Wells Gray Park as a World Heritage Site has its benefits in maintaining its conservation, providing an increase in revenue from tourism for cities close by, like Clearwater, and earning it international recognition. However, potential negative impacts must also be considered. Yes, Wells Gray will be known to the people of the world, but this also means that tourism in this park will bring a substantial increase in human activity, due largely to the fact that Wells Gray does allow human recreational activity, provided it is environmentally compatible. More people means more intensive management will be required in the area to ensure that the environment remains as it has all these years. In my opinion, the benefits would outweigh the costs as long as people respect that park as they have all these years and management is maintained.

WORDS: 715